Descriptions of Existing Types of Furniture
From BikeOff Parking Standards Consultation
| What YOU can do |
|---|
|
The aim of this wiki is to consult you on current bicycle parking advice and to combine knowledge, expertise and experience to produce comprehensive and definitive guidelines. The information contained in this WIKI represents a “best of breed” for bicycle parking provision generated from a representative sample of available guidelines. The objective is to create guidance that people agree on and want to see applied.
|
Contents |
Descriptions of Existing Types of Furniture
- The U-stand, or 'Sheffield' stand (an upturned U), has become almost universally specified by groups lobbying for cycle parking. It has the virtues of simplicity, longevity (20yrs); value for money (£100 – 200 including fitting), prevents bikes falling over, and its generic nature allows for great variation. The Sheffield Stand is a very basic form of parking which is ideal for short term parking for all types of cycle, though it is not always the best option for long term and high density parking.[1]
- The U-stand design can be improved by the addition of a lower crossbar, which makes it more suitable for ‘step through’ frame cycles and children’s cycles, and reduces the tendency for the front wheel to turn. There are successful examples of 600mm wide versions, which include a crossbar. For locations/attractions with a significant proportion of children, stands with a lower or slanting crossbar should also be considered.[2]
- U-stands also allow use with all types of locks.[3]
- ‘A’ stands are widely used in the USA and have advantages over the "U" type Sheffield stand in terms of footprint, ease of use and tidiness, but because they reduce sightlines they may be less appropriate for use at junctions. A rounded ‘A’ design is particularly recommended for smaller bicycles.[4]
- Butterfly shaped stands are similar in design to U-stands but with ‘feet’ closer together. This type has the benefit of a smaller ‘footprint’ when empty, although cycles parked at them may be less stable when knocked.[5]
- Some older designs of cycle parking rely on a feature that grips the front wheel with a slot, i.e. concrete slabs . Such designs do not provide an attachment point for a padlock however and can result in a buckled front wheel, and should therefore be replaced with, for e.g. U-stands.[6]
- Purpose built cycle racking may be used in supervised cycle storage areas such as indoor station cycle parks, where a high density of parking per m 2 is required. Well-designed storage of this type is significantly more expensive than Sheffield stands, but has a useful role where space is at a premium.[7]
- In some areas cycle stands have been provided that incorporate a lock, from which the key can be withdrawn once a coin has been inserted. These locks are rarely used, as the keys soon disappear, and in any event cyclists normally carry their own padlocks. The provision of such stands is not recommended.[8]
References
- ↑ Department for Transport (2006). Key elements of cycle parking provision.Bristol City Council: A Guide to Cycle Parking Provision (2005).Sustrans (2007). Chapter 9 - Signing, Parking and Other Details. Nottinghamshire County Council (2006). Haringey Council (2006). Appendix 1 – Parking Standards.
- ↑ Sustrans Cycle Parking Sheet FF37 (2004).
- ↑ Safe Routes to Schools (2007).
- ↑ Transport for London (2007). Cycling Design Standards. Cambridge Cycling Campaign Cycle Parking Standards (2006).Wycombe District Council Cycle Parking Standards (2006).
- ↑ Wycombe District Council Cycle Parking Standards (2006). Nottinghamshire County Council (2006).
- ↑ Transport for London (2007). Cycling Design Standards.
- ↑ Transport for London (2007). Cycling Design Standards.
- ↑ Transport for London (2007). Cycling Design Standards.
